Questionnaire on the CJEU’s judgments in relation to the independence of issuing judicial authorities and effective judicial protection

12 March 2020|PUBLICATION
Publication cover

In 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union interpreted in a number of judgments to what extent a Public Prosecutor’s Office falls within the concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ under Article 6(1) of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) and the surrender procedures between the Member States. The CJEU clarified in this case law the requirements of objectivity and independence and the need for effective judicial protection that must be afforded to the requested persons if an EAW is issued by a Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Following a mandate given by the Council, Eurojust and the EJN worked, in close coordination, on a questionnaire and compilation of replies. The aim of the questionnaire was to assist practitioners in the application of the aforementioned new CJEU case law as it has raised many questions amongst practitioners regarding the legal position of public prosecutors in the Member States.

A first version of this compilation was presented at the COPEN Meeting of 19 June 2019 (Council document no. 10016/19). An updated version was published in November 2019 to include new national legislation and more certificates in which Member States ensured compliance with the requirements set by the CJEU’s case law (Council document no. 10016/19/ REV 1). Subsequent judgments of the CJEU on this topic in October and December 2019 prompted a further update of the document, including an additional question on the requirements of effective judicial protection. The present compilation includes a brief summary of the most relevant judgments that the CJEU delivered on this issue in the period between May and December 2019, and compiles the replies received from the Member States, the United Kingdom and Norway.




[DOCX] (5.98 MB)



[PDF] (165.91 KB)