<<
>>

4.3 Resolving conflicts of jurisdiction

Eurojust has considerable experience in preventing and resolving conflicts of jurisdiction and facilitating transfers of criminal proceedings from one country to another. The Agency is uniquely placed to detect linked and parallel proceedings and advise the judicial authorities of the Member States involved on how to reach a shared decision on which State is best placed to prosecute, based on Eurojust’s Guidelines on jurisdiction.

In 2024, the Agency continued to advise national authorities on which State is best placed to prosecute a case, how to overcome issues related to transfers of proceedings and how to prevent ne bis in idem issues.

A new Regulation on the transfer of proceedings in criminal matters was published in November 2024. It incorporates many of the recommendations from the Eurojust Report on the transfer of proceedings in the European Union. The Regulation introduces uniform procedures for the transfer of proceedings between Member States, starting from 1 February 2027 and will be instrumental in Eurojust’s future casework. The Regulation states that national authorities may, at any stage of the procedure, request the assistance of Eurojust or the European Judicial Network. Moreover, the Agency, in particular, may facilitate consultations between the relevant countries.

Resolving jurisdiction, priority to prosecute and transfer of proceedings in a murder case

CRIME: In August 2024, a suspected murder takes place in international waters within the Swedish economic zone. The suspect and the victim are German nationals travelling on a German-flagged sailing yacht. They quarrel and end up fighting in the water, where the suspect eventually deliberately drowns the victim. Witnesses from Germany, on another sailing yacht, call the Swedish Coast Guard. The victim is declared dead at Gothenburg Hospital. The suspect is arrested and placed in custody in Sweden.

JUDICIAL ISSUE: The Swedish prosecutor submits a request for the transfer of proceedings to Germany. The request mentions that the alleged offence took place in international waters, but within the Swedish economic zone, and that both the suspect and the victim are German citizens on a boat flying a German flag. It is therefore assumed that Germany has jurisdiction and is interested in prosecuting. It is explained that Sweden would also have jurisdiction only if it is established that the death occurred on Swedish territory, when the victim was declared dead in Gothenburg Hospital. If, on the other hand, the court in charge of reviewing the suspect’s pre-trial detention finds that the victim died well before reaching land, the suspect could be released based on lack of jurisdiction.

Germany agrees to take over the proceedings as it has jurisdiction, given that the case concerns German nationals. Sweden, therefore, provides the available evidence to enable the German prosecutor to request the issuing of an EAW against the suspect.

Eurojust's role: The Swedish judicial authority contacts Eurojust to ask for assistance in relation to a transfer of proceedings to Germany. The Swedish and German National Desks at the Agency work closely together to support the case. The Agency advises Germany to issue an EAW for the requested suspect so that he can be kept in custody in Sweden, based on the EAW and not only on the basis of Swedish jurisdiction. The German authorities issue an EAW in early October, and the suspect agrees to the request to be surrendered and is transferred to Germany in November.

flags of sweden and germany, logo eurojust
<<
>>